Five Governance Reasons Funders Are Rejecting You

Sign up to receive insights like this in your inbox, or join the Future Directors Hub to receive this and more.

When it comes to attracting capital investment, philanthropic or government funding, companies of any type must not only showcase their purpose and operational excellence but increasingly demonstrate strong governance practices.

Funders will prioritise companies with robust governance structures to mitigate risks and ensure the long-term sustainability of their investment. In this article, we explore five governance reasons that often lead funders to reject companies. By understanding these factors, companies can proactively address governance gaps and increase their chances of securing investment. 


1 - Lack of Transparency

Transparency is a cornerstone of good governance. Companies that fail to provide clear and comprehensive information about their operations, financials, and decision-making processes are likely to raise red flags among funders. Lack of transparency undermines trust and increases the perceived risk associated with investment. To overcome this hurdle, companies should focus on enhancing their reporting standards, disclosing relevant information, and adopting transparent communication practices.

2 - Weak Board Structure, Succession and Independence

Funders closely evaluate the composition and effectiveness of a company's board of directors. A weak board structure, with inadequate independence, diversity and succession planning, raises concerns about robustness of decisions, conflicts of interest and limited oversight. Funders seek companies with directors who possess relevant expertise and demonstrate a commitment to acting in the best interests of the company and its stakeholders. Enhancing board diversity and strengthening independence are crucial steps to attract funding.

3 - Ineffective Risk Management

Sound risk management practices are vital for companies seeking investment. Funders assess a company's ability to identify, assess, and mitigate risks effectively. Companies that lack a comprehensive risk management framework or fail to implement appropriate controls are viewed as riskier investments. To address this, companies must develop a robust risk management strategy, establish internal controls, and demonstrate a proactive approach to risk mitigation.

4 - Ethical and Compliance Issues

Companies with a history of ethical breaches, non-compliance with regulations, or legal disputes face significant hurdles in attracting funders. Unethical behavior not only damages a company's reputation but also indicates a weak governance culture. Funders look for companies that prioritize ethics, compliance, and adhere to legal requirements. Implementing strong compliance programs and promoting an ethical corporate culture are crucial for securing investment.

5 - Lack of Long-Term Vision

Funders seek companies with a clear long-term vision and strategic direction. Companies that lack a well-defined strategy, fail to articulate their goals or demonstrate short-sighted decision-making are likely to be rejected by investors. To overcome this hurdle, companies should develop a comprehensive strategic plan that outlines their mission, vision, and growth strategy. Demonstrating a thoughtful and achievable long-term vision is essential to attract funders who are seeking sustainable investments. And finally, your board must be fully aligned and recruited behind this strategic vision. 

In an increasingly competitive investment and philanthropic funding landscape, strong governance practices are critical for organisations looking to secure significant funding. By addressing these five governance reasons, you can position yourself as attractive investment opportunities. 

Transparency, strong board structures, effective risk management, ethical compliance, and a clear long-term vision are all essential elements for building trust and demonstrating a commitment to long-term success. By prioritising governance, companies can enhance their prospects of securing the funding they need to grow and thrive in today's business environment.

If you aren’t sure where you stand on these five areas of concern, we recommend starting with what we call a Board Healthcheck. Think of it as a full body scan at the doctor’s that will highlight what’s working, what could be improved, and where there are discrepancies and disagreements within the boardroom (often hidden from view) that are impacting the board’s ability to perform to their full potential.


Sign up to our newsletter to get more content like this.


Previous
Previous

10 Questions Funders Are Asking Boards to Judge Effectiveness

Next
Next

Holistic Board Leadership